< Skip to content
The Second Life of Objects

The Second Life of Objects

What new upholstery, an old surface and a familiar silhouette can tell us about living with vintage design.

The first thing you notice about the Earth chair is the contrast. Brown upholstery gathers into a generous seat, while the chrome-plated frame catches the light in a crisp outline. The matching ottoman extends the invitation to settle in. Offered by Artibus365 as a Percival Lafer design from 1970s Brazil, this set has been reupholstered. Its fabric belongs to a later chapter of its life.

That detail makes the chair an interesting place to begin a conversation about sustainability. The object has changed, yet it remains recognisable. Someone chose to put new work and material into an existing piece of furniture. The question is what that intervention has allowed to continue.

Brown upholstered Earth chair and matching ottoman with a chrome-plated frame
Earth chair and ottoman, catalogued by Artibus365 as Percival Lafer, Brazil, 1970s. Reupholstered. Photograph: Artibus365.

A chair can outlive its fabric

Upholstery has an unusually intimate relationship with its owner. It receives the weight of the body, the friction of clothing and the repeated pressure of a favourite position. It also gives a chair much of its visual identity: a change of colour, texture or padding can alter how we read the entire form.

A second example makes this especially clear. On a Danish dining chair in the Artibus365 collection, pale, textured Tisca upholstery sits within a dark wooden frame. The open space below the backrest and the substantial lines of the wood remain prominent. The new textile introduces a softer rhythm without taking over the silhouette.

The chair is offered under Poul H. Poulsen's name for Gængsø Møbler, with a 1970s date. For this discussion, the visible encounter between the retained frame and replacement fabric is the essential detail. It lets us consider a piece of furniture as several connected elements, each with its own condition and history.

Dark wooden Danish dining chair with light textured replacement upholstery
Danish dining chair, catalogued by Artibus365 as Poul H. Poulsen for Gængsø Møbler, 1970s. Replacement Tisca upholstery. Photograph: Artibus365.

Neither example makes reupholstery a universal prescription. An original textile may be an important part of a design's history, even when it is worn. Before changing it, there is a worthwhile question to ask: what would be lost along with the old material?

What the surface remembers

A wooden surface can be surprisingly informative. Colour may come from a stain or coating as well as the timber beneath it. Gloss changes the way light reveals a curve. The finish is part of the appearance the maker created, and later alterations may have changed it again.

The Canadian Conservation Institute treats original furniture finishes as historically and aesthetically significant. Its guidance also draws attention to the accumulated effects of cleaning, polishing and refinishing. A surface that looks uneven to one owner may contain information that another would want to preserve.

For a living interior, this creates a productive tension. We want furniture we can use, but we may also want to retain the evidence that makes it particular. A careful intervention begins by understanding the object and deciding how much needs to change. The ambition to make everything look new can otherwise remove precisely what drew us to the piece.

Patina deserves a similarly attentive eye. A softened edge may be appealing; a failing joint needs assessment. Age can enrich an object's appearance while also revealing work that must be done. Looking closely allows both observations to coexist.

The environmental question is about the next chapter

The European Environment Agency identifies longer product lifespans as a way to reduce demand for new materials and products. In the context of furniture, the possibility is straightforward: a chair that continues to serve its purpose may postpone the need for a replacement.

For an individual vintage purchase, however, age alone cannot establish an environmental benefit. New upholstery, repair materials, packing and transport are also part of the picture. These examples have no published comparative lifecycle assessment, so there is no responsible basis for assigning them a carbon saving.

A more useful question is whether the object will be used, and for how long. Buying an additional chair that remains in storage tells a different story from keeping a familiar one in daily service. Sometimes the most convincing second life begins with furniture already in the room.

The reason to keep it

There is also an aesthetic argument for continuity. Furniture from another period can interrupt the uniformity of a newly furnished interior. The Lafer set's rounded upholstery and reflective frame create a different visual tempo from the Danish chair's dark wood and pale textile. Each gives a room something specific to respond to.

Living with such pieces does not require an expectation of rising resale prices. Market demand can change. The pleasure of a particular proportion, the comfort of a familiar seat and the significance of a surviving surface are reasons for ownership in their own right.

At Artibus365, we want the description of a vintage object to make its next chapter easier to understand: how it is catalogued, what condition it is in and what has been changed. The photographs here show two possible continuations. Their second lives will take shape in use, in the rooms and routines of the people who choose them.


Sources and object notes

Previous article Vintage Tisca Rugs: How to Read the Labels

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields